Phone: 49 30 897 19 90

Fax: 49 30 897 19 920

Email: mail@issa-legal.de


Publications by
Tarek Alexander Issa, M.Sc.

Articles in professional journals (in German language)


  • Comment on the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt a. M., decision of 16 June 2025, Ref. No. 6 W 75/25, "Determination of the value in dispute when transmitting positive data to credit agencies", GRUR-Prax 2025, 570.


  • Comment on the Münster Administrative Court, decision of 11 April 2025, Ref. 1 L 59/25, "The public library may label a book it provides with the classification note "Work with controversial content"", GRUR-Prax 2025, 397.


  • Comment on the KG, judgment of 13 May 2024, case no. 10 U 84/22, "No violation of personal rights by reporting on love affairs between celebrities", GRUR-Prax 2024, 547.


  • Comment on LG Hamburg, judgment of 1 December 2023, case no. 315 O 262/18, "Filter option 'Prefer fast connections' in the DB travel information without displaying competitors' connections is misleading", GRUR-Prax 2024, 280.


  • Comment on the Cologne Regional Court's judgment of 26 January 2023, case no. 14 O 24/22, "No copyright protection for the T-shirt slogan 'vaccinated, chipped, dewormed' in combination with graphic design", GRUR-Prax 2023, 721.


  • Comment on the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, decision of 15 May 2023, Ref. No. 3 V a 2/23, "Copyright of the attorney as an objection to a third party's request for inspection of the files", GRUR-Prax 2023, 468.


  • Comment on VG Karlsruhe, judgment of 25 August 2022, Ref. No. 3 K 606/21, "Inadmissible lawsuit by a political party against press work of the Federal Constitutional Court", GRUR- Prax 2023, 106.


  • Comment on the Higher Regional Court of Dresden, decision of 15 August 2022, Ref. No. 4 U 1083/22, "Inaccurate technical description of an assessed product can be a "value-neutral misrepresentation"", GRUR-Prax 2022, 615.


  • Comment on ECJ, judgment of 28 April 2022, case no. C-559/20, "The provision on capping the value of the dispute in the case of reimbursement of warning costs under Section 97a III of the Copyright Act is in conformity with EU law", GRUR-Prax 2022, 353.


  • Comment on the Hamburg Higher Administrative Court, judgment of 20 September 2021, case no. 3 Bf 87/18, "Copyright protection may preclude access to information on a lawyer's written submission", GRUR-Prax 2022, 11.


  • Comment on OLG Karlsruhe, judgment of 14 July 2021, case no. 6 W 8/21, "Facebook's liability for injunctive relief in the case of unfair "fact check" notice", GRUR-Prax 2021, 570.


  • Comment on the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt aM, decision of 9 September 2020, case no. 6 W 82/17, "No "increase fee" when representing two applicants for injunctive relief based on different intellectual property rights", GRUR- Prax 2020, 571.


  • Comment on the Federal Constitutional Court, decision of 6 November 2019, Ref. No. 1 BvR 276/17, "Right to be Forgotten II", GRUR-Prax 2020, 50.


  • Comment on the Federal Constitutional Court, decision of 6 November 2019, Ref. No. 1 BvR 16/13, "Right to be Forgotten I", GRUR-Prax 2020, 49.



  • "ECJ submission on provider obligations in hate postings"; comment on OGH Vienna, decision of 25 October 2017, Ref. 6 Ob 116/17b, GRUR-Prax 2018, 130.


  • "The "1-and-1 principle" - On the procedure according to Section 101 Para. 9 UrhG and the usability in civil proceedings of information according to Section 101 Para. 2 Sentence 1 No. 3 UrhG in so-called "reseller" cases"; essay in ZUM 2017, p. 390 ff.


  • "How much law is enough? On the legal legitimacy in file-sharing processes"; essay in ZUM 2016, 431 ff.


  • Note on LG Frankfurt am Main, judgment of 08.07.2015, Ref. No. 2-06 S 21/14; MMR 2015, 749 ff.


  • **The pdf file is made available with the kind permission of Deutscher Fachverlag GmbH

Court decisions won

*Decision won in previous employment relationship